My doctor came
into the room this morning and shared with me that my irregular heart beats
returned at midnight. My second ablation procedure wasn't successful after all.
I felt sad, frustrated, fearful, nervous... It was the
second time for the procedure, a re-do; it was supposed to be a success. Was
this second ablation for nothing?
Prof Tan sat down by my bedside and took time to explain
everything clearly, going through the different considerations he had to take.
1. Difficulty of the procedure
- Extra pathways (at birth) can be found at different
parts of the heart, and mine happens to be at a relatively tricky position
- What makes it even harder is that my heart continues to
beat/move as the doctor tries to aim the catheter at the extra pathway; the
doctor has to make sure that the powered catheter doesn't hit the good parts of
the heart (which can cause even more riskier complications)
2. Minimal level of risk
- Taking into account the above difficulties, Prof Tan
did his best to damage my extra pathway at the least level of risk
- He could have powered the catheters at a higher amount
of watts, but the trade-off was that he'll be doing it at higher risks (eg burning
a hole in my heart), which would have dire consequences in terms of
complications... And Prof Tan was not willing to do that "to a young
heart"
3. Two options, moving forward
a) Going for a third ablation- which he advised against,
due to the above reasons
b) Continue with my medicine, and hopefully with given
time, the function of my heart will improve. Another plus point to consider is
that the damages from the two ablations would have gotten rid of the
palpitations completely (an earlier problem which I had during chemotherapy)
---
In essence, the ablation was to improve my lower than
average function of the heart (measured by LVEF). This could have been caused
by my Wolffe-Parkinson-White syndrome, and/or the negative impacts of
chemotherapy. We went ahead with the procedure, thinking it would at least
eliminate one of the reasons for my low heart function.
But my extra pathway has been so stubborn- even with two
ablation procedures, it just did not budge (and even if it did, it was only for
a few hours). With it being so stubborn, as well as the addition of the
increased risks in getting it ablated the third time... we decided against it.
We would be patient, and I would continue to take my medicine and we'll see how
it goes.
Prof Tan said that he had a patient who took 2 years to
increase her heart function (and hers was really bad, at around 10%; they even
considered doing a heart transplant). Mine's hovering around 40-45%, while the
normal range is from 50-60%. It's just a bit more to go!
It is not the best news after everything, but God is
still good. With no more palpitations, and with more time- I have faith that my
heart will be strong again.








